Comparative evaluation of two methods care of the perioperative period after laparoscopic operations on uterine appendages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2017.5.110165Keywords:
FTS, laparoscopy, uterine appendages, perioperative periodAbstract
Aim – тo assess the impact of the early multimodal rehabilitation concept on postoperative period after laparoscopic operations on uterine appendages.
Маterials and methods. The study involved 79 patients who were randomized by envelope method in two groups. In the main group (26 patients), a protocol of early multimodal rehabilitation (ERAS) was used. In the control group (53 patients), the traditional perioperative regimen was used. In both groups, laparoscopic operations were performed under general anesthesia with mechanical ventilation (propofol + fentanyl). In perioperative anesthesia NSAIDs (dexketoprofen, ketorolac, paracetamol) were included. Non-invasive monitoring was performed by the «Leon» monitor (StO2, blood pressure, heart rate, capnogram), hourly diuresis was taken into account, thermometry was performed. In the postoperative period analgesia with combination with systemic administration of dexketoprofen (100–150 mg/day) + ketorolac (60 mg/day) + paracetamol (3000 mg/day) was used.
Results. The groups were homogeneous according to anamnestic (the beginning of menstruation, the number of pregnancies, childbirth, abortions, miscarriages), anthropometric and demographic characteristics, the duration of operations, blood loss and baseline values of systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressures and heart rate. In groups the volumes of diuresis did not differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Positive intraoperative hemohydrate balance in the FTS group was almost half that in the control group. When assessing pain at rest by VAS, a statistically significant difference was found at the 6 and 24 hours study stages. Nevertheless, at the study stages the pain level in the control group did not exceed 30 mm, which indicates adequate analgesia at rest. The level of cough pain in the control group exceeded the level of pain in the main group, the statistical difference was determined after 6 hours and 24 hours, but was above 30 mm, which required additional administration of analgetics. The urinary and venous catheter, as well as the drainage in the main group, were removed on the first day, in the control group – on the second day. Recovery of peristalsis and the possibility of verticalization of the main group patients occurred earlier than in the patients of the control group. The postoperative patient bed-day of the main group (FTS) patients was half that in the control group without FTS.
In groups the volumes of diuresis did not differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Positive intraoperative hemohydrate balance in the FTS group was almost half that in the control group. When assessing pain at rest by VAS, a statistically significant difference was found at the 6 and 24 hours study stages. Nevertheless, at the study stages the pain level in the control group did not exceed 30 mm, which indicates adequate analgesia at rest. The level of cough pain in the control group exceeded the level of pain in the main group, the statistical difference was determined after 6 hours and 24 hours, but was above 30 mm, which required additional administration of analgetics. The urinary and venous catheter, as well as the drainage in the main group, were removed on the first day, in the control group – on the second day. Recovery of peristalsis and the possibility of verticalization of the main group patients occurred earlier than in the patients of the control group. The postoperative patient bed-day of the main group (FTS) patients was half that in the control group without FTS.
Conclusions. The proposed package of measures is one of the ways to implement the Fast track concept for laparoscopic operations on the uterine appendages. The introduction of the Fast Track surgery concept allowed to achieve a significant reduction in the postoperative bed-day, which undoubtedly has an economic effect and significantly increases the prestige of doctors.
References
Wodlin, N. B., & Nilsson, I. (2013) The development of fast-track principles in gynecological surgery. Acta Obstetr. Gynecol. Scand., 92(1), 17–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01525.x.
Bedaiwy, M. A., Sheyn, D., Eghadami, L., Abdelhafez, F. F., Volsky, I. G., Nickles-Fader, A., & Escobar, P. E. (2015) Laparoscopic single-site for benign ovarien cystectomies. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 79, 179–183. doi: 10.1159/000367659.
Nelson, G., Altman, A. D., Nick, A., Meyer, L. A., Ramirez, P. T., Achtari, C., et al. (2016) Guidelines for pre- and intra-operative care in gynecologic, oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Part I. Gynecologic Oncology, 140(2), 313–322. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.11.015.
Nelson, G., Altman, A.D., Nick, A., Meyer, L. A., Ramirez, P. T., Achtari, C., et al. (2016) Guidelines for post-operative care in gynecologic/ oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Part II. Gynecologic Oncology, 140(2), 323–332. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.12.019.
Simacheva, S. A. (2014) Realizaciya koncepcii FAST TRACK khirurgii u pacientok ginekologicheskogo profilya v usloviyakh universitetskoj kliniki [The possible implementation of the concept in a fast track university clinic patients gynecological]. Tavricheskij mediko-biologicheskij vestnik, 17, 2(66), 119–121. [in Russian].
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
