The impact of acute post-extraction oroantral communications surgical treatment on patients' quality of life in early post-operative period

Authors

  • I. M. Got' Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Ukraine,
  • I. S. Sorokivskyi Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Ukraine,
  • Yu. O. Medvid Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Ukraine,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2017.6.115262

Keywords:

oroantral fistula, quality of life, orthodontic space closure

Abstract

The research objective is to study the impact of plastic surgery different methods of acute post-extraction oroantral communications treatment on patients' quality of life in early post-operative period.

Materials and methods. The study included 41 patient aged between 18 and 58 years receiving treatment of maxillary sinus perforation, which was caused by tooth extraction. The patients were divided into 3 groups – 14, 12 and 15 persons respectively. Plastic surgery of the oroantral communication in the first group was done in accordance with the methods suggested by the authors using collagen cone and membrane. The same surgery in the second group was done with PRF (Platelet-rich fibrin). In the third (control group), the communication was closed by the vestibular flap following the Rehrmann method.

Results of patients' quality of life evaluation after plastic surgery treatment of acute post-extraction oroantral communication show the decrease of its general indicator in early post-operative period in all groups of patients. The general quality of life indicator (well-being indicator) shows a tendency to increase over the first 24 hours after the surgery in both study and control groups. This may mean that a relatively small trauma in a maxillofacial area has a significant influence on patients' perception of their condition and well-being.

Absolute numbers of well-being indicator over the first 24 hours after the surgery in the third group were almost 1.5 times higher than those in the groups 1 and2. Ina comparative study of the groups 1 and 3 and then the groups 2 and 3, we observed a significant difference between well-being indicator levels (p < 0.01). The control group demonstrated the return to the pre-operative life quality values on the 7-th day after the surgery. While at the same time, those values in the study groups were equal to the pre-operative ones already on the 4-th day.

Conclusions. Operation trauma which was caused by the plastic surgery for closure of acute oroantral communication leads to the decrease of patients' quality of life (oral-related conditions), which correlates with the volume of a surgery and its complexity. The use of less traumatic methods of oroantral communication plastics facilitate the statistically significant decrease of these plastics negative impact on patients' quality of life in early post-operative period and enables the earlier recovery.

References

Gazhva, S. I., Guluev, R. S., & Gazhva, Yu. V. (2012) Kachestvo zhizni paciientov s zabolevaniyami polosti rta (obzor literatury) [The quality of life in paitents with diseases of oral cavity (review of literature)]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 4, [in Russian].

Dmitrieva, E. O. (2014) Eksperymentalne obgruntuvannia zastosuvannia materialu Easy-graft ta dynamika yakosti zhyttia pislia yoho vykorystannia u khvorykh na heneralizovanyi parodontyt II stupenia [Rationale for experimental using of Easy-Graft material and dynamics of life quality after its applying in patients with generalized periodontitis II severity level]. Morpholohiia, 8(1), 40–45. [in Ukrainian].

Alzarea, B. K. (2016). Assessment and Evaluation of Quality of Life (OHRQoL) of Patients with Dental Implants Using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14)-A Clinical Study. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research, 10(4), ZC57–60. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18575.7622.

Deepti, C., Rehan, H. S., & Mehra, P. (2009). Changes in quality of life after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar teeth. Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 8(3), 257–260. doi: 10.1007/s12663-009-0063-2.

Dholam, K. P., Dugad, J. A., & Sadashiva, K. M. (2017). Impact of oral rehabilitation on patients with head and neck cancer: A study using the Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire and the Oral Health Impact Profile-14. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 117(4), 559–562. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.06.019.

Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2013). Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. John Wiley & Sons.

Nicolaisen, M. H., Bahrami, G., Schropp, L., & Isidor, F. (2016). Functional and Esthetic Comparison of Metal-Ceramic and All-Ceramic Posterior Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prostheses. The International journal of prosthodontics, 29(5), 473–81. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4646.

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.

Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 46(12), 1417–1432. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N .

Batra, H., Jindal, G., & Kaur, S. (2010). Evaluation of different treatment modalities for closure of oro-antral communications and formulation of a rational approach. Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 9(1), 13–18. doi: 10.1007/s12663-010-0006-y.

Herdman, M., Fox-Rushby, J., & Badia, X. (1997). ‘Equivalence’and the translation and adaptation of health-related quality of life questionnaires. Quality of Life Research, 6(3), 237–47. doi: 10.1023/A:1026410721664.

Ibikunle, A. A., & Adeyemo, W. L. (2016). Oral health-related quality of life following third molar surgery with or without application of ice pack therapy. Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 20(3), 239–247.

Locker, D. (1988). Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework. Community Dent Health, 5, 3–18.

World Health Organization (1948). Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization, as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, pp. 19-22 (June 1946); signed on 22 July 1946 by the Representatives of 61 States,(Official Records of the World Health Organization, No. 2 p. 100) and Enterd into Force on 7 April 1948. Retrieved from http://www. who. int/abouwho/en/definition. html.

Silva, I., Cardemil, C., Kashani, H., Bazargani, F., Tarnow, P., Rasmusson, L., & Suska, F. (2016). Quality of life in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery–A two-centered Swedish study. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 44(8), 973–978. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.04.005.

Slade, G. D. (1997). Derivation and validation of a short‐form oral health impact profile. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 25(4), 284–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x.

Slade, G. D., & Spencer, A. J. (1994). Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community dental health, 11(1), 3–11.

Slade, G. D. (1997). Measuring oral health and quality of life. Chapel Hill.

Papagiannopoulou, V., Oulis, C. J., Papaioannou, W., Antonogeorgos, G., & Yfantopoulos, J. (2012). Validation of a Greek version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) for use among adults. Health and quality of life outcomes, 10, 7. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-7.

World Health Organization (1980). International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps: a manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease; publ. for trial purposes in accordance with resolution WHA29. 35 for the Twenty-ninth World Health Assembly, May 1976. Geneva.

Downloads

How to Cite

1.
Got’ IM, Sorokivskyi IS, Medvid YO. The impact of acute post-extraction oroantral communications surgical treatment on patients’ quality of life in early post-operative period. Zaporozhye Medical Journal [Internet]. 2017Nov.15 [cited 2024Nov.25];(6). Available from: http://zmj.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/115262

Issue

Section

Original research