Laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy versus laparoscopic (single-port and four-port) cholecystectomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2018.02.124932Keywords:
laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomyAbstract
The purpose of the study is a comparative analysis of laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy and (single-port and four-port) cholecystectomy in patients with cholecystolithiasis with isolated gallstones.
Material and methods. 136 patients with cholecystolithiasis were involved in a one-center open prospective study, aged between 22 and 78 years, mean age was 48.9 ± 12.6 years, among them 79.41 % were women. Depending on the method of treatment, the patients were divided into three groups. The first group consisted of 53 patients who underwent laparoscopic four-port cholecystectomy (4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy – 4PLC), the second – 50 patients who underwent single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), the third group – 33 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy (LCLT). Groups of patients were comparable in age. The operating time, the terms of activation after surgery, the hospital length of stay, the duration of hyperthermia, intraoperative and postoperative complications presence were analyzed.
Results. The mean duration of laparoscopic four-port cholecystectomy was 42.83 ± 16.97 minutes, that was significantly greater than the mean duration of SILC (36.60 ± 14.37 minutes), (P = 0.039), but shorter than the mean duration of laparoscopic cholecystolythotomy (61.06 ± 13.27 minutes), (P = 0.001). The shortest hospital length of stay was in LCLT group. The hyperthermia duration after surgical interventions did not depend on the type of operation (P > 0.05) and did not exceed one day for all types of operations. In 42.6 % (58/126) of the total number of operated patients temperature rise was not observed at all, among them 23 patients in the 4PLC group, 21 patients in the SILC group and 14 patients in the LCLT group.
Conclusions. Laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy allows gall bladder-preserving and postcholecystectomy syndrome development preventing in patients with cholecystolithiasis, reducing the number of postoperative complications and the hospital length of stay. Reduction of recurrent stones formation in the bile ducts after operations on the gall bladder is associated with organ-preserving interventions, namely cholecystolythotomy.
References
Fathy, O., Zeid, M. A., Abdallah, T., Fouad, A., Eleinien, A. A., el-Hak, N. G., et al. (2003) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report on 2000 cases. Hepatogastroenterology, 50(52), 967–971.
Hall, T. C., Dennison, A. R., Bilku, D. K., Metcalfe, M. S., & Garcea, G. (2012) Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review. Archives of Surgery, 147(7), 657–666. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.814.
Howard, D. P. J., Isherwood, J., Jabri, Y., Saunders, R., & Phillips, D. (2011) Factors associated with prolonged hospital stay following planned day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: General 0032. British Journal of Surgery, 98, 139.
Jaunoo, S. S., Mohandas, S., & Almond, L. M. (2010) Postcholecystectomy syndrome (PCS). Int. J. Surg., 8, 15–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.10.008.
Kim, J. Y., Kim, K. W., Ahn, C. S., Hwang, S., Lee, Y. J., Shin, Y. M., & Lee, M. G. (2008) Spectrum of Biliary and Nonbiliary Complications After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Radiologic Findings. American Journal of Roentgenology, 191(3), 783–789. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3602.
Lohan, D., Walsh, S., McLoughlin, R., & Murphy, J. (2005) Imaging of the complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur Radiol., 15(5), 904–912. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2519-6.
Lum, Y. W., House, M. G., Hayanga, A. J., & Schweitzer, M. (2006) Postcholecystectomy syndrome in the laparoscopic era. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech., 16(5), 482–485. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.16.482.
Tan, Y.-Y., Zhao, G., Wang, D., Wang, J.-M., Tang, J.-R., & Ji, Z.-L. (2013) A New Strategy of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Cholecystolithiasis: Calculi Removal and Gallbladder Preservation. Digestive Surgery, 30(4–6), 466–471 .doi: 10.1159/000357823.
Thurley, P. D., & Dhingsa, R. (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: postoperative imaging. AJR, 191(3), 794–801. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3485.
Ye, L., Liu, J.,Tang, Y.,Yan, J.,Tao, K.,Wan, C., & Wang, G. (2015) Endoscopic minimal invasive cholecystolithotomy vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treatment of cholecystolithiasis in China: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg., 13, 227–238. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.12.014.
Zhang, Y., Peng, J., Li, X., & Liao, M. (2016) Endoscopic-Laparoscopic Cholecystolithotomy in Treatment of Cholecystolithiasis Compared With Traditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech., 26(5), 377–380. doi:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000305.
Zou, Y. P., Du, J. D., Li, W. M., Xiao, Y. Q., Xu, H. B., Zheng, F., et al. (2007) Gallstone recurrence after successful percutaneous cholecystolithotomy: a 10-year follow-up of 439 cases. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int., 6, 199–203.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
