Capabilities of pleural cavities ultrasound examination in pleural empyema stage diagnosis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2018.4.135656Keywords:
ultrasound imaging, pleural cavity, pleural empyema, VATSAbstract
Objective: to improve the treatment results of patients with pleural empyema (PE) by developing a method of empyema stage diagnosing and expanding the indications for VATS.
Materials and methods. The treatment results of patients with PE were analyzed. Patients with nonspecific parapneumonic EP stages 1 and 2 (according to the EACTS classification) who underwent VATS were included in the study. Prior to surgery, on the first or second day after admission to the hospital, the patient was subjected to ultrasound examination of the pleural cavities with the diaphragm excursion determination. Diaphragmatic relative mobility was calculated as the ratio of diaphragm excursion on the affected side to the healthy one.
Based on the endoscopic picture and the morphological examination of the biopsy material (pleura) results the disease stage was determined.
Results. The study included 67 patients with PE (men – 50, women – 17). The first stage of EP was diagnosed in 30 cases (men – 22, women – 8), the second – in 37 (men – 28, women – 9). The mean age was 46.36 ± 14.01 years. It was found that at the first stage the median of diaphragmatic relative mobility – 0.596 (0.444; 0.714) was significantly greater than at the second stage – 0.078 (0.048; 0.118), P < 0.0001.
By ROC analysis the sensitivity of the proposed method was found to be 0.933; specificity 0.973; cut point = 0.255; AUC = 0.0977.
Conclusions. Determination of the diaphragm relative excursion in patients with EP is characterized by high sensitivity (0.933) and specificity (0.973) in the differential diagnosis of disease stages 1 and 2. The stage 2 recognition allows to establish indications for the use of VATS, enabling the treatment results improvement and reducing the length of hospital stay.
References
Chung, J., Lee, S., Kim, K., Jung, J., Son, H., & Sun, K. (2014). Optimal Timing of Thoracoscopic Drainage and Decortication for Empyema. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 97(1), 224–229. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.08.039.
Hamm, H., & Light, R. (1997). Parapneumonic effusion and empyema. European Respiratory Journal, 10(5), 1150–1156.
Colice, G., Curtis, A., Deslauriers, J., Heffner, J., Light, R., Littenberg, B., et al. (2000). Medical and Surgical Treatment of Parapneumonic Effusions. Chest, 118(4), 1158–1171. doi :10.1378/chest.118.4.1158.
Cremonesini, D., & Thomson, A. (2007). How Should We Manage Empyema: Antibiotics Alone, Fibrinolytics, or Primary Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS)? Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 28(3), 322–332. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-981653.
Havelock, T., Teoh, R., Laws, D., & Gleeson, F. (2010). Pleural procedures and thoracic ultrasound: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax, 65(2), i61–i76. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.137026.
Redden, M., Chin, T., & van Driel, M. (2017). Surgical versus non-surgical management for pleural empyema. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD010651.pub2/abstract. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010651.pub2
Shen, K. R., Bribriesco, A., Crabtree, T., Denlinger, C., Eby, J., Eiken, P., et al. (2017). The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines for the management of empyema. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 153(6), 129–146.
Tronina, E., Shipulin, P., Bajdan, V., Severgin, V., Ageyev, S., Kirilyuk, A., et al. (2016). Vozmozhnosti sovremennykh tekhnologij v lechenii e'mpiemy plevry [Possibilities of Modern Technologies in the Treatment of Pleural Empyema]. Klinichna khirurgiya, 3, 46–48. [in Russian].
Vaziri, M., & Abed, O. (2012). Management of Thoracic Empyema: Review of 112 Cases. Acta Medica Iranica, 50(3), 203–207.
Vyhnánek, F., Jírava, D., & Ocadlík, M. (2011). The role of VATS in the treatment of thoracic empyema. Rozhledy V Chirurgii, 90(3), 143–147.
Scarci, M., Abah, U., Solli, P., Page, A., Waller, D., van Schil, P., et al. (2015). EACTS expert consensus statement for surgical management of pleural empyema. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 48(5), 642–53. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv272.
Lichtenstein, D. (2015). BLUE-Protocol and FALLS-Protocol. Chest, 147(6), 1659–1670. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1313.
Miller, A. (2016). Practical approach to lung ultrasound. BJA Education, 16(2), 39–45. doi: 10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkv012.
Khalaturnyk, I. B. (2017). Ultrazvukova diahnostyka travmatychnykh ushkodzhen orhaniv hrudnoi klitky (Avtoref. dis…kand. med. nauk). [Ultrasound diagnostics of traumatic damages of the chest organs. Dr. med. sci. diss.]. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
Di Napoli, G., Ronzini, M., & Paradies, G. (2014). VATS: first step in the parapneumonic empyema. Giornale di Chirurgia, 35(5–6), 146–8.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
