Clinical and social aspects of dysmenorrhea development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2018.5.141539Keywords:
dysmenorrhea, risk factors, pain, life qualityAbstract
Dysmenorrhea is one of the most spread diseases in gynecological practice. The pathology rate is about 45–95 % of menstruated women.
Aim of the research was to determine clinical and social aspects of women with dysmenorrhea.
Materials and methods. The study involved 155 women with diagnosis dysmenorrhea who formed the basic group. 55 persons had primary form of disease (the I group), 100 patients – secondary one (the II group). Control group included 30 women without pathology. Intensity of pain was determined by Visual Analogue Scale, quality of life – 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. For statistical analysis we used program Stаtistica 6.0.
Results. We did not find any association between employment, body mass index and development of dysmenorrhea. The number of persons with reduced physical activity was 1.86 times more in the group with dysmenorrhea (61.94 %) than among healthy individuals (33.33 %; χ2 = 7.28, P = 0.007; OR = 3.84, CI = 1.67–8.83, P = 0.002). Gynecological pathology in anamnesis had only 46.67 % of controls and 74.19 % of basic group patients (χ2 = 7.77, P = 0.005; OR = 3.29, CI = 1.47–7.33, P = 0.004). High rate of gynecological diseases among patients with dysmenorrhea was due to great frequency of this pathology in the women of the II group. Almost the same rate of primagravida and multigravida was also among persons in the observed groups.
Duration of pain syndrome usually was 1–2 days in the I group women. Persons of the II group indicated prolonged pain syndrome during menses lasting 2–4 days. Besides this, chronic pelvic pain (χ2 = 19.42, P < 0.001 compared to the I group), dyspareunia and dyschezia (χ2 = 5.95, P = 0.03 compared to the I group), pain, which was not connected with menstrual cycle (χ2 = 16.95, P < 0.001 compared to the I group) were typical for patients of the II group. Most women of both groups indicated moderate intensity of pain (67.27 % persons in the I group and 73.00 % in the II). Algomenorrhea, premenstrual syndrome, heavy menstrual bleeding were mostly diagnosed in the persons with secondary dysmenorrhea.
All the scores of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey were significantly decreased in basic group patients compared to controls. Index of “Bodily pain” was less by 25.56 % in persons with dysmenorrhea compared with healthy individuals (P < 0.001). Score “Vitality” was the lowest among other indices of psychological component – by 27.27 % (P < 0.001) compared to controls. We determined decrease of “Social Functioning” and “Role-Emotional Functioning” in women with secondary dysmenorrhea more than in patients with primary one (P = 0.049).
Conclusions. Among social factors that can lead to dysmenorrhea we found association of reduced physical activity with the development of pathology (OR = 3.84, CI = 1.67–8.83, P = 0.002). Chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, pain which is not related to menstrual cycle, are more common symptoms associated with secondary dysmenorrhea compared to primary one (P < 0.05). But there is no difference in intensity of pain between women with primary and secondary forms of pathology. Decreased quality of life is typical for women with dysmenorrhea.
References
Iacovides, S., Avidon, I., & Baker, F. C. (2015). What we know about primary dysmenorrhea today: a critical review. Hum Reprod Update, 21(6), 762–778. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv039.
Bernardi, M., Lazzeri, L., Perelli, F., Reis, F. M., & Petraglia, F. (2017). Dysmenorrhea and related disorders. F1000Res, 6, 1645. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11682.1.
Osayande, A. S., & Mehulic, S. (2014). Diagnosis and initial management of dysmenorrhea. Am Fam Physician, 89(5), 341–346.
Balık, G., Ustüner, I., Kağıtcı, M., & Sahin, F. K. (2014). Is there a relationship between mood disorders and dysmenorrhea? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, 27(6), 371–374. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.01.108.
Bahrami, A., Sadeghnia, H., Avan, A., Mirmousavi, S. J., Moslem, A., Eslami, S., et al. (2017). Neuropsychological function in relation to dysmenorrhea in adolescents. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 215, 224–229. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.06.030.
Al-Jefout, M., Seham, A. F., Jameel, H., Randa, A. Q., Ola, A. M., Oday, A. M., & Luscombe, G. (2015). Dysmenorrhea: Prevalence and Impact on Quality of Life among Young Adult Jordanian Females. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, 28(3), 173–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.07.005.
Tomás-Rodríguez, M. I., Palazón-Bru, A., Martínez-St John, D. R., Navarro-Cremades, F., Toledo-Marhuenda, J. V., & Gil-Guillén, V. F. (2017). Factors Associated with Increased Pain in Primary Dysmenorrhea: Analysis Using a Multivariate Ordered Logistic Regression Model. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, 30(2), 199–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2016.09.007.
Potur, D. C., Bilgin, N. C., & Komurcu, N. (2014). Prevalence of dysmenorrhea in university students in Turkey: effect on daily activities and evaluation of different pain management methods. Pain Manag Nurs, 15(4), 768–777. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2013.07.012.
Amiri Farahani, Ë. L., Hasanpoor-Azghdy, S. B., Kasraei, H., & Heidari, T. (2017). Comparison of the effect of honey and mefenamic acid on the severity of pain in women with primary dysmenorrhea. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 296(2), 277–283. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4409-6.
De Sanctis, V., Soliman, A., Bernasconi, S., Bianchin, L., Bona, G., Bozzola, M., et al. (2015). Primary Dysmenorrhea in Adolescents: Prevalence, Impact and Recent Knowledge. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev, 13(2), 512–520.
Chen, C. X., Kwekkeboom, K. L., & Ward, S. E. (2016). Beliefs About Dysmenorrhea and Their Relationship to Self-Management. Res Nurs Health, 39(4), 263–276. doi: 10.1002/nur.21726.
Iacovides, S., Avidon, I., Bentley, A., & Baker, F. C. (2014). Reduced quality of life when experiencing menstrual pain in women with primary dysmenorrhea. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 93(2), 213–217. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12287.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)