Evaluation of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Functional Outcome Score informativeness for identification of short-term vital outcome in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2018.6.146536Keywords:
cerebral hemorrhage, X-Ray tomography, mortality, prognosisAbstract
The main purpose of the study was to conduct the informative value of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Functional Outcome Score (ICH-FOS) assessment for the determination of a short-term vital prognosis in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (SSICH).
Materials and methods. A prospective, cohort study was conducted among 191 patients (117 men and 74 women, the mean age was 65.1 ± 0.8 years) with SSICH treated in a conservative manner. This study included clinical assessment (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, Glasgow Coma Scale), neuroimaging and biochemistry examination. The ICH-FOS was used in order to conduct a complex assessment of the patients’ state severity on admission. The functional outcome of the SSICH acute period was assessed on the 21st day of the disease in accordance with the modified Rankin Scale.
Results. Lethal outcome was noted in 22 patients (11.5 %). The patients with the lethal outcome during the acute period had a higher value of the ICH-FOS (8 (7–10) versus 4 (3–6), P < 0.0001) in the onset of SSICH. Based on a ROC-analysis it was determined that the ICH-FOS >6 is the predictor of the lethal outcome in the acute period of SSICH (Se = 77.3 %; Sp = 81.1 %; AUC ± SE (95 % CI) = 0.86 ± 0.04 (0.80–0.91), P < 0.0001). In the group of patients with the ICH-FOS value >6 (n = 49) lethal outcome was noted in 34.7 % of cases, whereas in the group of patients with the ICH-FOS value ≤6 (n = 142) it was noted only in 3.5 % of cases.
Conclusions. The Intracerebral Hemorrhage Functional Outcome Sсore is a highly informative tool for the determination of a short-term vital prognosis of SSICH acute period outcome. The ICH-FOS >6 is associated with a 9.9-fold increased risk of lethal outcome (RR 95 % CI 3.8–25.3, P < 0.0001).
References
Ministerstvo okhorony zdorovia Ukrainy (2014). Unifikovanyi klinichnyi protokol ekstrenoi, pervynnoi, vtorynnoi (spetsializovanoi), tretynnoi (vysokospetsializovanoi) medychnoi dopomohy ta medychnoi reabilitatsii «Hemorahichnyi insult (vnutrishnomozkova hematoma, anevryzmalnyi subarakhnoidalnyi krovovylyv)». Retrieved from http://moz.gov.ua/docfiles/dod275_ukp_2014.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Rogoza, S. V. (2015). Prohnozuvannia perebihu ta naslidku hostroho periodu supratentorialnoho vnutrishnomozkovoho krovovylyvu na tli arterialnoi hipertenzii [Prediction of course and functional outcome of an acute period of hypertensive supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhages against the background of arterial hypertension]. Ukrainskyi nevrolohichnyi zhurnal, 4, 49–54. [in Ukrainian].
Aiyagari, V. (2015). The clinical management of acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Expert Rev Neurother, 15(12), 1421–1432. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2015.1113876.
An, S. J., Kim, T. J., & Yoon, B. W. (2017). Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Clinical Features of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An Update. J Stroke, 19(1), 3–10. doi: 10.5853/jos.2016.00864.
Cai, X., & Rosand, J. (2015). The Evaluation and Management of Adult Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Semin Neurol, 35(6), 638–645. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1564687.
Finocchi, C., Balestrino, M., Malfatto, L., Mancardi, G., Serrati, C., & Gandolfo, C. (2018). National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurol Sci. doi: 10.1007/s10072-018-3495-y.
Hung, L. C., Sung, S. F., Hsieh, C. Y., Hu, Y. H., Lin, H. J., Chen, Y. W., et al. (2017) Validation of a novel claims-based stroke severity index in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. J Epidemiol, 27(1), 24–29. doi: 10.1016/j.je.2016.08.003.
Ji, R., Shen, H., Pan, Y., Wang, P., Liu, G., Wang, Y., et al. (2013). A novel risk score to predict 1-year functional outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage and comparison with existing scores. Crit Care, 17(6), R275. doi: 10.1186/cc13130.
Mattishent, K., Kwok, C. S., Ashkir, L., Pelpola, K., Myint, P. K., & Loke, Y. K. (2015). Prognostic Tools for Early Mortality in Hemorrhagic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Neurol, 11(4), 339–48. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2015.11.4.339.
Rahmani, F., Rikhtegar, R, Ala, A., Farkhad-Rasooli, A., & Ebrahimi-Bakhtavar, H. (2018). Predicting 30-day mortality in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage: Evaluation of the value of intracerebral hemorrhage and modified new intracerebral hemorrhage scores. Iran J Neurol, 17(1), 47–52.
Safatli, D. A., Günther, A., Schlattmann, P., Schwarz, F., Kalff, R., & Ewald, C. (2016). Predictors of 30-day mortality in patients with spontaneous primary intracerebral hemorrhage. Surg Neurol Int, 7(18), 510–517. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.187493.
Spina, S., Marzorati, C., Vargiolu, A., Magni, F., Riva, M., Rota, M., et al. (2018). Intracerebral hemorrhage in intensive care unit: early prognostication fallacies. A single center retrospective study. Minerva Anestesiol., 84(5), 572–581. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.12225-X.
Sung, S. F., Hsieh, C. Y., Lin, H. J., Chen, Y. W., Chen, C. H., Kao Yang, Y.H., & Hu, Y. H. (2016). Validity of a stroke severity index for administrative claims data research: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res, 16(1), 509. doi: [10.1186/s12913-016-1769-8].
Yuan, R., Lei, C., Wu, S., Wei, C., Xiong, Y., Xu, M., et al. (2017). Prognostic Significance of Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Vascular Structural Abnormality-Related Intracerebral Hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 26(3), 636–643. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.11.012.
Zweig, M. H., & Campbell, G. (1993). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem, 39(4), 561–577.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)