Clinical and neurophysiological peculiarities in patients with ischemic supratentorial stroke
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2013.4.16829Keywords:
ischemic stroke, electroencephalographic pattern, prognosisAbstract
The aim of the work – optimization of diagnostic and prognostic arrangements in patients with ischemic supratentorial stroke in acute period by revealing of pathoneurophysiological peculiarities of realization of clinical pattern and stroke acute period outcome on the basis of clinical neurophysiological comparisons depending on the subtypes of stroke according to The Oxfordshire Community Stroke Classification.
Material and methods: Clinical and computed electroencephalography investigations of 118 patients (mean age 67,9±0,8) in acute period of ischemic supratentorial stroke (firstly appeared) was made. Depending on clinical subtype of the stroke that was detected during admission according to The Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classification (OCSP) all patients were devided into 3 groups: 1st – 50 patients with total anterior circulation infarct (TACI-subtype), 2nd – 38 patients with partial anterior circulation infarct (PACI) and 3rd – 30 patients with lacunar infarct (LACI). Clinical examination included Rankin scale graduation and NIHSS detection. Separately for intact and affected hemisphere value of absolute (mcv2) and relative (%) spectrum rhythm activity (RSRA) of δ- (0,5-4 Hertz), θ- (4-8 Hertz), α- (8-13 Hertz), β- (13-35 Hertz) range, and θlo- (4-6 Hertz), θhi- (6-8 Hertz), αlo- (8-10 Hertz), αhi - (10-13 Hertz), βlo- (13-25 Hertz) та βhi- (25-35 Hertz) subranges were evaluated.
Results: The level of RSRA in δ- and θ-range in affected hemisphere exceeded the same parameters in patients with stroke PACI-subtype and LACI-subtype in 2,3 and 3,0 times respectively (p<0,01). The same time RSRA in α-, β-ranges, αlo-, αhi-, βlo-subranges in comparison with PACI-subtype was lower in 2,4; 2,1; 2,5; 2,4 and 1,6 times respectively (p<0,01); in comparison with LACI-subtype – in 3,4; 1,7; 3,3; 1,5 and 1,9 times respectively (p<0,01). Spectral structure of intact hemisphere EEG-pattern in patients with TACI-subtype of ischemic supratentorial stroke was characterized with evaluation of RSRA in δ- and θ-ranges, θlo-subrange in 1,8 (p<0,01), 1,6 (p<0,05) and 1,7 (p<0,01) times respectively compare to PACI-subtype due to decreasing of the RSRA of α-range and αlo-subrange in 1,6 (p<0,01) and 1,5 (p<0,05) times respectively.
It was revealed that Rankin’s scale score on 21day in patients with TACI-subtype of acute ischemic supratentorial stroke by OCSP classification correlated levels of RSRA of δ- (R=0,50, p<0,05), α-ranges (R=-0,53, p<0,05), αlo- (R=-0,43, p<0,05), αhi-subranges (R=-0,59, p<0,05), DAR (R=0,55, p<0,05), TAR (R=0,35, p<0,05), DTABR (R=0,47, p<0,05) of affected hemisphere, levels of RSRA of δ- (R=0,45, p<0,05), α- (R=-0,34, p<0,05), β-ranges (R=-0,33, p<0,05), αhi- (R=-0,39, p<0,05), βlo- (R=-0,31, p<0,05), βhi-subranges (R=-0,30, p<0,05), DAR (R=0,42, p<0,05), TAR (R=0,29, p<0,05), DTABR (R=0,40, p<0,05) of intact hemisphere; Rankin’s scale score on 21day in patients with PACI-subtype of acute ischemic supratentorial stroke by OCSP classification correlated levels of RSRA of δ-range (R=0,47, p<0,05), DAR (R=0,41, p<0,05), DBR (R=0,36, p<0,05), DTR (R=0,35, p<0,05), DT1R (R=0,35, p<0,05) of affected hemisphere, levels of DBR (R=0,47, p<0,05), TBR (R=0,47, p<0,05), DTABR (R=0,37, p<0,05) of intact hemisphere; Rankin’s scale score on 21day in patients with LACI-subtype of acute ischemic supratentorial stroke by OCSP classification correlated levels of RSRA of θ-range (R=0,40, p<0,05), θhi- (R=0,38, p<0,05), αhi-subranges (R=-0,37, p<0,05), TAR (R=0,42, p<0,05), T2AR (R=0,41, p<0,05), TBR (R=0,36, p<0,05), DT1R (R=0,35, p<0,05) of affected hemisphere, level of T2AR (R=0,36, p<0,05) of intact hemisphere.
Conclusion. Combined evaluation of integral clinical-neurophysiological parameters of stroke subtype according OCSP classification and parameters of spectral EEG-pattern helps to optimize the diagnosis and prognosis of acute period of ischemic supratentorial stroke outcome.
References
Волошин П.В. Аналіз поширеності та захворюваності на нервові хвороби в Україні / П.В. Волошин, Т.С. Міщенко, Є.В. Лекомцева // Международный неврологический журнал – 2006. – №3 (7). – С. 9–13.
Гнездицкий В.В. Обратная задача ЭЭГ и клиническая электроэнцефалография / Гнездицкий В.В. – М.: МЕДпресс-информ, 2004. – 624 с.
Мищенко Т.С. Эпидемиология неврологических заболеваний в Украине / Т.С. Мищенко // НейроNEWS. – 2008. – №3. – С. 76–78.
Особенности биоэлектрической активности мозга в острейшем периоде восстановления после ишемического вертебробазилярного инсульта под влиянием блокады кальциевых каналов / В.И. Черний, Е.В. Черний, И.И. Зинкович, Т.В. Островая, А.С. Герасименко // Практична ангіологія. – 2007. – №4. – С. 66–71.
Реактивные изменения ЭЭГ в условиях селективной блокады кальциевых каналов у пациентов с острым нарушением мозгового кровообращения / Е.В. Черний, И.И. Зинкович, Т.В. Островая, А.С. Герасименко // Нейронауки: теоретичні та клінічні аспекти. – 2007. – Т. 3, №1–2. – С. 101–105.
Classifi cation and natural history of clinically identifi able subtypes of cerebral infarction / Bamford J., Sandercock P., Dennis M. [et al.] // Lancet. – 1991. – Vol. 337. – P. 1521–1526.
Continuous EEG monitoring during thrombolysis in acute hemispheric stroke patients using the brain symmetry index / de Vos C., van Maarseveen S., Brouwers P. [et al.]. // J Clin Neurophysiol. – 2008. – V. 25 (2). – P. 77–82.
Finnigan S. EEG in ischaemic stroke: quantitative EEG can uniquely inform (sub-)acute prognoses and clinical management / S. Finnigan, M. van Putten // Clin Neurophysiol. – 2013 – V. 124 (1). –P. 10–19.
Multimodal integration of EEG, MEG and fMRI data for the solution of the neuroimage puzzle / Babiloni F. , Mattia D., Babiloni C. [et al.] // Magnetic Resonsnse Imaging. – 2004. – V. 22 (10). – P. 1471–1476.
Quantitative EEG indices of sub-acute ischaemic stroke correlate with clinical outcomes / Finnigan S., Walsh M., Rose S. [et al.] // Clin Neurophysiol. – 2007. – V. 118 (11). – P. 2525–2532.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)