Preoperative assessment of medial acetabular wall bone stock in dysplastic deformation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2019.6.186504Keywords:
hip replacement, dysplastic coxarthrosis, acetabular componentAbstract
Acetabular reconstruction remains to be one of the crucial aspects of total hip replacament in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) that provides endoprosthesis’ long-term stability and general success of the operation. Among the parameters that influence surgical technique of acetabular reconstruction, medial wall bone stock of the endoprosthesis’ bed zone should be taken into consideration.
Purpose of the work to assess medial wall bone stock in the site of acetabular component’s bony bed in normal and dysplastic deformed hips and to define correlation with indices of sphericity and sectoral deficiency of the acetabulum based on MSCT-morphomerty.
Materials and methods. A complex comparative MSCT-mophometric investigation of 32 normal hips and 65 hips with DDH (Crowe I – 26 hips (40.0 %), Crowe II – 23 hips (35.4 %), Crowe III – 16 hips (24.6 %)) was performed. There were assessed width of the medial wall bone stock in the projection of the crucial ligament’s and acetabular component’s bony beds according to the proposed method; their correlation with indices of femoral head’s cranial migration and acetabular horizontal sphericity angle.
Results. It has been revealed that measurements in he site of the crucial ligament’s bony bed based on pelvic images obtained by a conventional biplanar X-ray remains to be biased and doesn’t correspond to true width of medial acetabular wall bone stock. Absolute width of the medial acetabular wall in sites of the crucial ligament’s / acetabular component’s bony beds carried out through the special MSCT-recontruction methodic was defined as: 4.3 mm [3.3; 4.8]/7,2 mm [6.2; 7.8] for normal hips, 9.95 mm [7.5; 11.6]/11.85 mm [9.8; 13.5] for Crowe I hips,15 mm [11.7; 17.3]/15,7 mm [13,5; 17,3] for Crowe II hips and 15.45 mm [13.7; 19.8]/16.05 mm [12.8; 20.2] for Crowe III hips, respectively. Correlations between medial acetabular wall bone stock in site of acetabular component’s bony bed and indices of femoral head’s cranial migration and acetabular horizontal sphericity angle were defined as: r = 0.36 (P = 0.006); r = 0.36 (P = 0.007), respectively.
Conclusions. Weak correlation of medial acetabular wall bone stock with indices of acetabular sphericity and sectoral deficiency requires the necessity of independent evaluation of this index during preoperative planning. Due to the impossibility of the index assessment based on the conventional pelvic X-ray, application of elaborated MSCT-morphometric methodic seems to be clinically valuable and should be applied during preoperative examination of patients with DDH.
References
Feugier, P., Fessy, M., Béjui, J., & Bouchet, A. (1997). Acetabular anatomy and the relationship with pelvic vascular structures implications in hip surgery. Surgical And Radiologic Anatomy, 19(2), 85-90. doi: 10.1007/bf01628131
Zhang, H., Huang, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhou, Y., Lv, M., & Jiang, Z. (2005). Acetabular Medial Wall Displacement Osteotomy in Total Hip Arthroplasty. The Journal Of Arthroplasty, 20(5), 562-567. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.007
Karachalios, T., Roidis, N., Lampropoulou-Adamidou, K., & Hartofilakidis, G. (2013). Acetabular reconstruction in patients with low and high dislocation. The Bone & Joint Journal, 95-B(7), 887-892. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.95b7.31216
Barrack, R. (2004). Neurovascular injury. The Journal Of Arthroplasty, 19(4), 104-107. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.02.013
Bell, A., Brand, R., & Pedersen, D. (1989). Prediction of hip joint centre location from external landmarks. Human Movement Science, 8(1), 3-16. doi: 10.1016/0167-9457(89)90020-1
Cameron, H. U. (1992). The technique of total hip arthroplasty. New York: Mosby Year Book.
Varodompun, N., Thinley, T., Visutipol, B., Ketmalasiri, B., & Pattarabunjerd, N. (2002). Correlation between the Acetabular Diameter and Thickness in Thais. Journal Of Orthopaedic Surgery, 10(1), 41-44. doi: 10.1177/230949900201000108
Kim, Y., Nam, K., Yoo, J., Kim, Y., & Kim, H. (2010). Cotyloplasty in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty for an Insufficient Acetabulum. Clinics In Orthopedic Surgery, 2(3), 148. doi: 10.4055/cios.2010.2.3.148
Crowe, J. F., Mani, V. J., & Ranawat, C. S. (1979). Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am., 61(1), 15-23.
Dorr, L. D., Jawakkol, S., Moorthy, M., Long, W., & Wan, Z. (1999). Medial protrusio technique for placement of a porous-coated, hemispherical acetabular component without cement in a total hip arthroplasty in patients who have acetabular dysplasia. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 81(1), 83-92.
Liu, R., Wang, K., Wang, C., Dang, X., & Tong, Z. (2009). Evaluation of medial acetabular wall bone stock in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip using a helical computed tomography multiplanar reconstruction technique. Acta Radiologica, 50(7), 791-797. doi: 10.1080/02841850903049366
Geijer, M., & El-Khoury, G. (2007). Imaging of the acetabulum in the era of multidetector computed tomography. Emergency Radiology, 14(5), 271-287. doi: 10.1007/s10140-007-0638-5
Bouffard,V., Begon, M., Champagne, A., Farhadnia, P., Vendittoli, P. A., Lavigne, M., & Prince, F. (2012). Hip joint center localisation: A biomechanical application to hip arthroplasty population. World Journal Of Orthopedics, 3(8), 131-136. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v3.i8.131
Beltran, L., Rosenberg, Z., Mayo, J., De Tuesta, M., Martin, O., Neto, L., & Bencardino, J. (2013). Imaging evaluation of developmental hip dysplasia in the young adult. American Journal Of Roentgenology, 200(5), 1077-1088. doi: 10.2214/ajr.12.9360
Jawad, M., & Scully, S. (2011). In Brief: Crowe’s Classification: Arthroplasty in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. Clinical Orthopaedics And Related Research, 469(1), 306-308. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1316-6
Karachalios, T., & Hartofilakidis, G. (2010). Congenital hip disease in adults. The Journal Of Bone And Joint Surgery. British Volume, 92-B(7), 914-921. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.92b7.24114
Yang, Y., Zuo, J., Liu, T., Xiao, J., Liu, S., & Gao, Z. (2017). Morphological Analysis of True Acetabulum in Hip Dysplasia (Crowe Classes I-IV) Via 3-D Implantation Simulation. The Journal Of Bone And Joint Surgery, 99(17), e92. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.16.00729
Tallroth, K., & Lepistö, J. (2006). Computed tomography measurement of acetabular dimensions: Normal values for correction of dysplasia. Acta Orthopaedica, 77(4), 598-602. doi: 10.1080/17453670610012665
Stein, M. G., Barmeir, E., Levin, J., Dubowitz, B., & Roffman, M. (1982). The medial acetabular wall: normal measurements in different population groups. Investigative Radiology, 17(5), 476-478. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198209000-00007
Okuzu, Y., Goto, K., Kawata, T., So, K., Kuroda, Y., & Matsuda, S. (2017). The relationship between subluxation percentage of the femoroacetabular joint and acetabular width in asian women with developmental dysplasia of the hip. The Journal Of Bone And Joint Surgery, 99(7), e31. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.16.00444
Hartofilakidis, G., Karachalios, T., Georgiades, G., & Kourlaba, G. (2011). Total hip arthroplasty in patients with high dislocation: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of fifteen years, of previous reports. The Journal Of Bone And Joint Surgery-American Volume, 93(17), 1614-1618. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.j.00875
Werner, C., Copeland, C., Ruckstuhl, T., Stromberg, J., Turen, C., & Bouaicha, S. (2011). Relationship between Wiberg's lateral center edge angle, Lequesne's acetabular index, and medial acetabular bone stock. Skeletal Radiology, 40(11), 1435-1439. doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1141-3
Anisimova, E. A., Jusupov, K. S., Anisimov, D. I., Popryga, D. V., & Popov, A. N. (2015). Morfometricheskoe obosnovanie algoritma vybora vertluzhnogo komponenta jendoproteza pri totalnom jendoprotezirovanii tazobedrennogo sustava s razlichnoj stepenju vyrazhennosti displasticheskogo koksartroza [Morphometric justification selection algorithm endoprosthesis acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty varying severity dysplastic coxarthrosis]. Bulletin of Medical Internet Conferences, 5(7), 1007-1011. [in Russian].
Lebedev, V. F., Dmitrieva, L. A., & Arsentev, L. I. (2013). Kliniko-rentgenologicheskie osobennosti displasticheskogo koksartroza ІІІ-ІV stadii
[Clinicodiagnostic peculiarities of dysplastic coxarthrosis of III-IV degree]. Bulletin of the East Siberian Scientific Center SBRAMS, 1(89), 49-53. [in Russian].
Loskutov, A. E., Olejnik, A. E., Zub, T. A. (2011). Osobennosti deformacii vertluzhnoj vpadiny pri displasticheskom koksartroze s pozicii jendoprotezirovanija [The features of deformation in dysplastic hip arthritis from the position of hip replacement]. Journal of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Prosthetics, 2, 23-28. [in Russian].
Loskutov, A. E. (2010). Jendoprotezirovanie tazobedrennogo sustava [Hip replacements]. Dnepropetrovsk. [in Russian].
Menshchikova, I. A., Volokitina, Е. А., Necvetov, P. V. (2003). Anatomo-rentgenologicheskoe obosnovanie optimalnoj implantacii vertluzhnogo komponenta v sluchajah slozhnogo jendoprotezirovanija [Anatomic-and-roentgenological substantiation of acetabular component optimal implantation in cases of complex endoprosthetics]. Genius of Orthopaedics, 1, 17-20. [in Russian].
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)