Response time of respondents to separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire as a diagnostic marker of depressive disorders

Authors

  • K. I. Linska State Institution “Institute of Neurology, Psychiatry and Narcology of National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”, Kharkiv,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2020.3.204950

Keywords:

depression, concomitant psychopathological symptoms, patient outcome assessment, AUDIT test, Derogatis questionnaire, chronometry, reaction time

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to assess the informativeness of the response time of respondents to separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire as a diagnostic marker of depressive disorders.

Material and methods. A total of 97 patients with depression (main group) were examined, the average age was 40.94 ± 1.25 years (among them, 51 people with diagnosed depressive episode (F32 according to ICD-10) and 46 people with diagnosed recurrent depressive disorder (F33 according to ICD-10), as well as 64 practically healthy individuals with an average age of 41.21 ± 1.21 years (control group). We used clinical-psychopathological, psychometric (Derogatis questionnaire), as well as psychophysiological methods using Reocom-stress software and hardware complex (manufacturer KhAI-Medika,Kharkiv,Ukraine), with the function of recording the time for answering questions (response time). All the described methods were used twice during the study: with an interval of 17–19 days, at the beginning (examination No. 1) and at the end (examination No. 2) of the inpatient treatment course.

Results. As a result of a comparative analysis of two information channels (traditional scores and response time to separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire), it was shown that the proportion of reaction time informativeness (in comparison with traditional scoring) increased in transition from survey No. 1 to survey No. 2 for markers of depressive disorders presence by 1.47 times (from 50.53 % to 74.29 %), and for markers of depressive disorders absence by 1.21 times (from 42.61 % to 51.76 %).

Conclusions. It has been proven that the response time to the separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire regarding concomitant psychopathological symptoms are an informative tool for objective diagnosis of depression, as well as for monitoring the quality of therapy for patients with this pathology.

References

World Health Organization. (2017, March 30). «Depression: let’s talk» says WHO, as depression tops list of causes of ill health. WHO. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/30-03-2017--depression-let-s-talk-says-who-as-depression-tops-list-of-causes-of-ill-health.

Mishyiev, V. D. (2004). Suchasni depresyvni rozlady [Contemporary Depressive Disorders]. Vydavnytstvo Ms. [in Ukrainian].

Yur'eva, L. N. (2006). Klinicheskaya suitsidologiya [Clinical suicidology]. Porogi. [in Russian].

Gilbody, S., Sheldon, T., & Wessely, S. (2006). Should we screen for depression? British Medical Journal, 332(7548), 1027-1030. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7548.1027

Il'in, E. P. (2001). Emotsii i chuvstva [Emotions and feelings]. Piter. [in Russian].

Jensen, A. R. (2006). Clocking the mind : mental chronometry and individual differences. Elsevier.

Maruta, N. A., & Linska, K. I. (2018). Khronometrychnyi profil khvorykh na depresiiu pry vykorystanni komp’iuternoho variantu shkaly Tsunha i yoho diahnostychne znachennia [Chronometric profile of patients with depression at using a computer version of Zung scale and its diagnostic value]. Ukrainskyi visnyk psykhonevrolohii, 26(4), 57-65. [in Ukrainian].

Maruta, N., & Linska, Е. (2019). Diagnosticheskoe znachenie vremeni otveta na voprosy u patsientov s depressiei pri ispol'zovanii komp'yuternogo varianta shkaly HADS [The Diagnostic Value of the Response Time to Questions in Patients with Depression when Using the Computer Version of the HADS Scale]. Psikhiatriya, psikhoterapiya i klinicheskaya psikhologiya, 10(2), 199-215. [in Russian].

Linska, K. I. (2019). Khronometrychnyi profil khvorykh na depresiieiu pry vykorystanni testu Spilberhera - Khanina [Chronometric profile of patients with depression at using Spielberger - Khanin’s test]. Ukrainskyi visnyk psykhonevrolohii, 27(1), 46-56. [in Ukrainian].

Silverstein, M., Feinberg, E., Sauder, S., Egbert, L., & Stein, R. (2010). Comorbid Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in an Urban Population of Mothers Screening Positive for Depression. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164(8), 778-779. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.116

Worley, M. J., Trim, R. S., Roesch, S. C., Mrnak-Meyer, J., Tate, S. R., & Brown, S. A. (2012). Comorbid depression and substance use disorder: Longitudinal associations between symptoms in a controlled trial. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 43(3), 291-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2011.12.010

Curry, J. F., Aubuchon-Endsley, N., Brancu, M., Runnals, J. J., & Fairbank, J. A. (2014). Lifetime major depression and comorbid disorders among current-era women veterans. Journal of Affective Disorders, 152-154, 434-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.012

Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., & Covi, L. (1973). SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale - preliminary report. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 9(1), 13-28.

Derogatis, L. R., & Savitz, K. L. (2000). The SCL-90-R and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) in primary care. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), Handbook of psychological assessment in primary care settings (pp. 297-334). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Churkin, A. A., & Martyushov, A. N. (1999). Kratkoe rukovodstvo po ispol'zovaniyu MKB-10 v psikhiatrii i narkologii [A brief guide to the use of ICD-10 in psychiatry and narcology]. Triada-X. [in Russian].

Hamilton, M. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 23(1), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56

Montgomery, S. A., & Åsberg, M. (1979). A New Depression Scale Designed to be Sensitive to Change. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134(4), 382-389. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.134.4.382

KhAI-Medika, OOO. (n.d.) Poligraf REOKOM STRESS [Polygraph REOKOM STRESS]. https://hai-medika.prom.ua/p358078095-poligraf-reokom-stress.html. [in Russian].

Gubler, E. V. (1978). Vychislitel'nye metody analiza i raspoznavaniya patologicheskikh protsessov [Computational methods for the analysis and recognition of pathological processes]. Meditsina. Leningr. otd-nie. [in Russian].

Lapach, S. N., Chubenko, A. V., & Babich, P. N. (2001). Statisticheskie metody v mediko-biologicheskikh issledovaniyakh s ispol'zovaniem Excel [Statistical methods in biomedical research using Excel]. Morion. [in Russian].

Kessing, L. V., & Bukh, J. D. (2017). The clinical relevance of qualitatively distinct subtypes of depression. World Psychiatry, 16(3), 318-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20461

Pettersson, A., Boström, K. B., Gustavsson, P., & Ekselius, L. (2015). Which instruments to support diagnosis of depression have sufficient accuracy? A systematic review. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 69(7), 497-508. https://doi.org/10.3109/08039488.2015.1008568

Serra, F., Spoto, A., Ghisi, M., & Vidotto, G. (2017). Improving Major Depressive Episode Assessment: A New Tool Developed by Formal Psychological Assessment. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 214. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00214

Maruta, N. O., & Linska, K. I. (2018). Suchasni napriamky u rozrobtsi instrumentiv dlia ob’iektyvnoi diahnostyky afektyvnykh rozladiv (ohliad literatury) [Modern trends in development of instruments for objective diagnosis of affective disorders (review of literature)]. Ukrainskyi visnyk psykhonevrolohii, 26(1), 110-115. [in Ukrainian].

How to Cite

1.
Linska KI. Response time of respondents to separate points of the Derogatis questionnaire as a diagnostic marker of depressive disorders. Zaporozhye Medical Journal [Internet]. 2020Jun.10 [cited 2024Nov.22];22(3). Available from: http://zmj.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/204950

Issue

Section

Original research