Results of surgical treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2022.6.261148Keywords:
wounds and injuries, tendon injuries, musculus biceps brachii, surgical treatmentAbstract
Rupture of the distal biceps tendon is an injury that most often affects men of working age, so the time and quality of rehabilitation is of great socio-economic importance. Conservative treatment in most cases is impractical, as it leads to a significant increase in treatment time and period of incapacity and does not provide a satisfactory recovery of functions. The main problems of surgical treatment of the distal biceps tendon rupture of the shoulder are considered in the article. Today, there are many methods of surgical treatment, including anchor fixation to the hump of the radial bone; fixation of the distal biceps tendon by using an oval-shaped cortical button fixator, etc. The article presents the main methods of treatment, their advantages and disadvantages.
The aim of the study. To improve the results of surgical treatment of distal biceps brachii tendon rupture by reducing the recovery time and reducing the proportion of complications using a modified technique of button fixation.
Materials and methods. The study was performed by retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment results of 35 patients with fresh rupture of the distal biceps tendon, who were divided into two groups – operated with anchor fixator (n = 15) and cortical button fixator (n = 20). Functional outcomes were assessed by the DASH scale in 3 days, 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months after the intervention; pain intensity was measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) after 3 days and 2 weeks at rest, after 6 weeks and 3 months – during exercise; the time of surgery was evaluated.
Results. There was a statistically significant improvement in the DASH score at 6 weeks and 3 months after intervention in the cortical fixator group (P = 0.008 and P = 0.003, respectively). Cortical fixation surgery required less surgical time (P = 0.0016) and was accompanied by less pain in the early postoperative period (P = 0.0015).
Conclusions. Surgical intervention with the proposed method takes less operating time, requires a shorter period of immobilization, is accompanied by lower risks for loss of the retainer stability. Features of the proposed intervention technique avoid heterotopic ossification. Early onset of active movements can accelerate the functional restoration of the injured limb. Surgical intervention with the proposed method requires less surgical access, accompanied by lower pain intensity in the early postoperative period.
References
Safran, M. R., & Graham, S. M. (2002). Distal biceps tendon ruptures: incidence, demographics, and the effect of smoking. Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (404), 275-283.
Launonen, A. P., Huttunen, T. T., Lepola, V., Niemi, S. T., Kannus, P., Felländer-Tsai, L., Berg, H. E., Laitinen, M. K., & Mattila, V. M. (2020). Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture Surgery: Changing Incidence in Finnish and Swedish Men Between 1997 and 2016. The Journal of hand surgery, 45(11), 1022-1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.07.024
Stoll, L. E., & Huang, J. I. (2016). Surgical Treatment of Distal Biceps Ruptures. The Orthopedic clinics of North America, 47(1), 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2015.08.025
Morrey, M. E., Abdel, M. P., Sanchez-Sotelo, J., & Morrey, B. F. (2014). Primary repair of retracted distal biceps tendon ruptures in extreme flexion. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 23(5), 679-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.030
Legg, A. J., Stevens, R., Oakes, N. O., & Shahane, S. A. (2016). A comparison of nonoperative vs. Endobutton repair of distal biceps ruptures. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 25(3), 341-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.10.008
Hansen, G., Smith, A., Pollock, J. W., Werier, J., Nairn, R., Rakhra, K. S., Benoit, D., & Papp, S. (2014). Anatomic repair of the distal biceps tendon cannot be consistently performed through a classic single-incision suture anchor technique. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 23(12), 1898-1904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.051
Kelly, M. P., Perkinson, S. G., Ablove, R. H., & Tueting, J. L. (2015). Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures: An Epidemiological Analysis Using a Large Population Database. The American journal of sports medicine, 43(8), 2012-2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515587738
Dyussenbayev, A. (2017). Age Periods Of Human Life. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(6). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.46.2924
Freeman, C. R., McCormick, K. R., Mahoney, D., Baratz, M., & Lubahn, J. D. (2009). Nonoperative treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures compared with a historical control group. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 91(10), 2329-2334. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.01150
Witkowski, J., Kentel, M., Królikowska, A., & Reichert, P. (2016). A Retrospective Evaluation of Anatomical Reinsertion of the Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Using an ACL TightRope® RT with a Titanium Cortical Button and Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Suture: A Preliminary Report. Polimery w Medycynie, 46(2), 163-169. https://doi.org/10.17219/pim/0000
Carter, T. H., Karunaratne, B. J., Oliver, W. M., Murray, I. R., White, T. O., Reid, J. T., & Duckworth, A. D. (2021). Acute distal biceps tendon repair using cortical button fixation results in excellent short- and long-term outcomes : a single-centre experience of 102 patients. The bone & joint journal, 103-B(7), 1284-1291. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2020-2246.R1
Legg, A. J., Stevens, R., Oakes, N. O., & Shahane, S. A. (2016). A comparison of nonoperative vs. Endobutton repair of distal biceps ruptures. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 25(3), 341-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.10.008
Gavrilă, T. M., & Cristea, Ștefan. (2018). Open versus arthroscopic surgery in acromioclavicular separation. Journal of Clinical and Investigative Surgery, 3(2), 82-87. https://doi.org/10.25083/2559.5555/3.2/82.87
Flinkkilä, T., Heikkilä, A., Sirniö, K., & Pakarinen, H. (2015). TightRope versus clavicular hook plate fixation for unstable distal clavicular fractures. European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 25(3), 465-469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1526-9
Cao, Y., Xu, Y., Hong, Y., & Xu, X. (2018). A new minimally invasive method for anatomic reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments with a Tightrope system. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 138(11), 1549-1555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2955-4
Pochini, A. C., Rodrigues, M., Yamashita, L., Belangero, P. S., Andreoli, C. V., & Ejnisman, B. (2017). Surgical treatment of pectoralis major muscle rupture with adjustable cortical button. Revista brasileira de ortopedia, 53(1), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2017.11.005
Witkowski, J., Królikowska, A., Czamara, A., & Reichert, P. (2017). Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Anatomical Repair of Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Rupture Using Suture Anchor Fixation. Medical science monitor, 23, 4961-4972. https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.903723
Holovakha, M. L., Kozhemiaka, M. O., Lisunov, M. S., & Bohdan, O. V. (2020) Sposib fiksatsii dystalnoho sukhozhylka bitsepsa pry yoho rozryvi [Method of fixation of the distal biceps tendon rupture]. Ukraine Patent UA 144648. https://sis.ukrpatent.org/uk/search/detail/1458389/
McKeon, B. P., Heming, J. F., Fulkerson, J., & Langeland, R. (2006). The Krackow stitch: a biomechanical evaluation of changing the number of loops versus the number of sutures. Arthroscopy, 22(1), 33-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.10.008
Langley, G. B., & Sheppeard, H. (1985, July). The visual analogue scale: Its use in pain measurement. Rheumatology International, 5(4), 145-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00541514
Aasheim, T., & Finsen, V. (2014). The DASH and the QuickDASH instruments. Normative values in the general population in Norway. The Journal of hand surgery, European volume, 39(2), 140-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193413481302
Dunphy, T. R., Hudson, J., Batech, M., Acevedo, D. C., & Mirzayan, R. (2017). Surgical Treatment of Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures: An Analysis of Complications in 784 Surgical Repairs. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 45(13), 3020-3029. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517720200
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
