Perioperative pain management in thoracic surgery and side effects in the early postoperative period

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2024.1.294208

Keywords:

analgesia, complications, multimodal analgesia, epidural analgesia, thoracotomy

Abstract

Aim. To study the impact of various methods of perioperative pain management on the frequency of postoperative complications in patients with lung cancer after thoracotomy.

Materials and methods. The study involved 157 patients who were divided into 4 groups. Multimodal analgesia (MA) group: according to the concept of preemptive analgesia, patients received 1000 mg paracetamol IV 1 hour before surgery and 50 mg dexketoprofen IV; in the postoperative period, dexketoprofen and paracetamol were administered every 8 hours as well as epidural analgesia: 40 mg of 2 % lidocaine solution after a catheter was placed and continuous ropivacaine infusion at a dose of 2 mg/ml (6–14 ml/h) in the postoperative period. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) group: epidural analgesia: administration of 40 mg of 2 % lidocaine solution after catheter placement, continuous ropivacaine infusion in the postoperative period at a dose of 2 mg/ml (6–14 ml/h). Preemptive analgesia (PA) group: according to the concept of preemptive analgesia – 1000 mg IV paracetamol 1 hour before surgery as well as 50 mg IV dexketoprofen; in the postoperative period, dexketoprofen and paracetamol were administered every 8 hours. Control group (C): patients received 50 mg IV dexketoprofen for postoperative analgesia. If the severity of the pain syndrome was more than 50 mm according to the visual analogue scale (VAS), patients of all groups were given 10 mg IV morphine. The study involved the registration of side effects in the postoperative period.

Results. Among 157 patients, complications in the postoperative period were observed in 61 patients (38.85 %). The frequency of complications in MA group was 10.8 % of the total number of patients, in TEA group – 12.7 %, PA – 6.4 %, and in C group – 8.9 %. The most common complaint among TEA group patients was injection-site itching (13.5 %). PA group patients had a significantly lower number of complications compared to TEA group (p = 0.035). There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of nausea or urinary retention in patients of all groups (p > 0.05). No difference was noted in the number of pulmonary complications depending on the method of perioperative analgesia (p > 0.05). 31 patients (75.6 %) of PA group did not have any complications, that was significantly different from TEA (p = 0.021) and MA (p = 0.039) patient groups.

Conclusions. The use of paracetamol and dexketoprofen combination in the perioperative period allows to reduce (p = 0.035) the total number of postoperative anesthetic complications compared to the use of only thoracic epidural analgesia. The use of a multimodal approach combining epidural analgesia and administration of paracetamol and dexketoprofen does not reduce (p > 0.05) the overall frequency of complications compared to patients without epidural analgesia.

Author Biographies

H. B. Poniatovska, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine

MD, PhD student of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

S. O. Dubrov, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine

MD, PhD, DSc, Professor of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

P. L. Poniatovskyi, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine

MD, PhD student  of the Department of Oncology 

S. O. Sereda, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine

MD, PhD student of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

M. V. Denysiuk, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine

MD, PhD student of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

S. V. Cherniaiev, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine

MD, PhD student of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

A. O. Kotliar, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine

MD, Assistant of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

References

Ukrainian cancer registry statistics. [Cancer in Ukraine, 2021-2022. Occupation, death, demonstration of oncological service]. Bulletin of National Cancer Registry of Ukraine. 2023;24. Ukrainian. Available from: http://www.ncru.inf.ua/publications/BULL_24/index.htm

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21763

American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2023 . Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2023. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2023/2023-cancer-facts-and-figures.pdf

Gerner P. Postthoracotomy pain management problems. Anesthesiol Clin. 2008;26(2):355-67, vii. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2008.01.007

Montes A, Roca G, Sabate S, Lao JI, Navarro A, Cantillo J, et al. Genetic and Clinical Factors Associated with Chronic Postsurgical Pain after Hernia Repair, Hysterectomy, and Thoracotomy: A Two-year Multicenter Cohort Study. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(5):1123-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000611

Brioude G, Gust L, Thomas PA, D'Journo XB. Complications postopératoires des exérèses pulmonaires [Postoperative complications after major lung resection]. Rev Mal Respir. 2019;36(6):720-37. French. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmr.2018.09.004

Pu CY, Batarseh H, Zafron ML, Mador MJ, Yendamuri S, Ray AD. Effects of Preoperative Breathing Exercise on Postoperative Outcomes for Patients With Lung Cancer Undergoing Curative Intent Lung Resection: A Meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(12):2416-2427.e4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.028

Rotman JA, Plodkowski AJ, Hayes SA, de Groot PM, Shepard JA, Munden RF, et al. Postoperative complications after thoracic surgery for lung cancer. Clin Imaging. 2015;39(5):735-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.05.013

Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78(5):606-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/78.5.606

Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002;183(6):630-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00866-8

Senturk JC, Kristo G, Gold J, Bleday R, Whang E. The Development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Across Surgical Specialties. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(9):863-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2017.0317

Ljungqvist O, Young-Fadok T, Demartines N. The History of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and the ERAS Society. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(9):860-2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2017.0350

Iyer A, Yadav S. Postoperative Care and Complications After Thoracic Surgery [Internet]. Principles and Practice of Cardiothoracic Surgery. InTech; 2013. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55351

Rawal N. Epidural technique for postoperative pain: gold standard no more? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37(3):310-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0b013e31825735c6

Novak-Jankovič V, Markovič-Božič J. Regional anaesthesia in thoracic and abdominal surgery. Acta Clin Croat. 2019;58(Suppl 1):96-100. doi: https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2019.58.s1.14

Listing H, Pöpping D. PRO: Epiduralanalgesie – Goldstandard bei abdominalen und thorakalen Eingriffen [Pro: Epidural Analgesia Remains the Gold Standard for Abdominal and Thoracic Surgery]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2018;53(4):237-44. German. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-104668

D'Ercole F, Arora H, Kumar PA. Paravertebral Block for Thoracic Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018;32(2):915-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2017.10.003

Harky A, Clarke CG, Kar A, Bashir M. Epidural analgesia versus paravertebral block in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019;28(3):404-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivy265

Lai J, Situ D, Xie M, Yu P, Wang J, Long H, et al. Continuous Paravertebral Analgesia versus Continuous Epidural Analgesia after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;27(5):297-303. doi: https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.20-00283

Zengin M, Alagoz A. Comparison of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Thoracic Paravertebral Block Applications in the Treatment of Acute Pain After Thoracotomy in Geriatric Patients. Cureus. 2021;13(10):e18982. doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18982

Jin J, Min S, Chen Q, Zhang D. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with tramadol and lornoxicam after thoracotomy: A comparison with patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(7):e14538. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014538

Kehlet H, Dahl JB. The value of "multimodal" or "balanced analgesia" in postoperative pain treatment. Anesth Analg. 1993;77(5):1048-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199311000-00030

Upp J, Kent M, Tighe PJ. The evolution and practice of acute pain medicine. Pain Med. 2013;14(1):124-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12015

Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248(2):189-98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a. PMID: 18650627.

Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Fast-track surgery. Br J Surg. 2005;92(1):3-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4841

Published

2024-02-05

How to Cite

1.
Poniatovska HB, Dubrov SO, Poniatovskyi PL, Sereda SO, Denysiuk MV, Cherniaiev SV, Kotliar AO. Perioperative pain management in thoracic surgery and side effects in the early postoperative period. Zaporozhye Medical Journal [Internet]. 2024Feb.5 [cited 2024Nov.22];26(1):27-32. Available from: http://zmj.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/294208