Comparison of the minimally invasive surgical methods of the cholelithiasis treatment: single-port and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Authors

  • V. N Klymenko
  • D. V Syvolap
  • B. S. Kravchenko

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2015.4.50310

Keywords:

cholecystolithiasis, laparoscopic surgery

Abstract

Aim and methods. In this paper, a comparative analysis of the results obtained in the performance of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and the traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was presented. Average duration of surgery, intra and postoperative complications, duration of pain, hyperthermia, a cosmetic effect were assessed and compared.

Results. SILS technique reduces the duration and intensity of post-operative discomfort associated with pain in the wound; achieve early almost complete physical and social adaptation, and return to the normal rhythm of life; get the best cosmetic result.

References

Babij, A. N. (2008) Organosokhranyayuschie operacii u bol'nykh zhelchnokamennoj boleznyu [Conserving surgery in patients with cholelithiasis]. Prakticheskaya medicina, 14(6), 99–103. [in Russian].

Galimov, O. V., Khanov, V. O., Fajzullin, T. R., & Ronzhin, A. E. (2012) Laparoskopicheskaya kholeciste′ktomiya po metodike «edinogo dostupa» s primeneniem ustrojstva dlya fiksacii zhelchnogo puzyrya [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy the procedure "single access" with the use of the device for fixing the gallbladder]. Klinicheskaya i e′ksperimental'naya khirurgiya. Retrieved from www.jecs.ru.

Chuang, S. H., Chen, P. H., Chang, C. M., & Lin, C. S. (2013) Single-incision vs three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for complicated and uncomplicated acute cholecystitis. World J. Gastroenterol, 19(43), 7743–7750. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7743.

Curcillo (2nd), P. G., Wu, A. S., Podolsky, E. R., Graybeal, C., Katkhouda, N., Saenz, A., et al. (2010) Single-port-access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases. Surg Endosc, 24(8), 1854–1860. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0856-x.

Geng, L., Sun, C., & Bai, J. (2013) Single incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One., 2, 8(10), e76530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076530. eCollection 2013.

Hao, L., Liu, M., Zhu, H., & Li, Z. (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with uncomplicated gallbladder disease: a meta-analysis. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech, 22(6), 487–497. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182685d0a.

Hernandez, J. M., Morton, C. A., Ross, S., Albrink, M., & Rosemurgy, A. S. (2009) Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients. Am. Surg, 75(8), 681–685.

Hirano, Y., Watanabe, T., Uchida, T., Yoshida, S., Tawaraya, K., Kato, H., & Hosokawa, O. (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: single institution experience and literature review. World J Gastroenterol., 16(2), 270–274.

Podolsky, E. R., Curcillo (2nd), P. G. (2010) Single port access (SPA) surgery-a 24-month experience. J Gastrointest Surg., 14(5), 759–767. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1081-6.

Prasad, A. (2010) Single incision laparoscopic surgery. World J. Gastroenterol, 16(21), 2705–2706.

How to Cite

1.
Klymenko VN, Syvolap DV, Kravchenko BS. Comparison of the minimally invasive surgical methods of the cholelithiasis treatment: single-port and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Zaporozhye Medical Journal [Internet]. 2015Sep.16 [cited 2024Nov.5];17(4). Available from: http://zmj.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/50310

Issue

Section

Original research