Comparison of the minimally invasive surgical methods of the cholelithiasis treatment: single-port and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Authors

  • V. N Klymenko
  • D. V Syvolap
  • B. S. Kravchenko

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2015.4.50310

Keywords:

cholecystolithiasis, laparoscopic surgery

Abstract

Aim and methods. In this paper, a comparative analysis of the results obtained in the performance of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and the traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was presented. Average duration of surgery, intra and postoperative complications, duration of pain, hyperthermia, a cosmetic effect were assessed and compared.

Results. SILS technique reduces the duration and intensity of post-operative discomfort associated with pain in the wound; achieve early almost complete physical and social adaptation, and return to the normal rhythm of life; get the best cosmetic result.

References

Babij, A. N. (2008) Organosokhranyayuschie operacii u bol'nykh zhelchnokamennoj boleznyu [Conserving surgery in patients with cholelithiasis]. Prakticheskaya medicina, 14(6), 99–103. [in Russian].

Galimov, O. V., Khanov, V. O., Fajzullin, T. R., & Ronzhin, A. E. (2012) Laparoskopicheskaya kholeciste′ktomiya po metodike «edinogo dostupa» s primeneniem ustrojstva dlya fiksacii zhelchnogo puzyrya [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy the procedure "single access" with the use of the device for fixing the gallbladder]. Klinicheskaya i e′ksperimental'naya khirurgiya. Retrieved from www.jecs.ru.

Chuang, S. H., Chen, P. H., Chang, C. M., & Lin, C. S. (2013) Single-incision vs three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for complicated and uncomplicated acute cholecystitis. World J. Gastroenterol, 19(43), 7743–7750. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7743.

Curcillo (2nd), P. G., Wu, A. S., Podolsky, E. R., Graybeal, C., Katkhouda, N., Saenz, A., et al. (2010) Single-port-access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases. Surg Endosc, 24(8), 1854–1860. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0856-x.

Geng, L., Sun, C., & Bai, J. (2013) Single incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One., 2, 8(10), e76530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076530. eCollection 2013.

Hao, L., Liu, M., Zhu, H., & Li, Z. (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with uncomplicated gallbladder disease: a meta-analysis. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech, 22(6), 487–497. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182685d0a.

Hernandez, J. M., Morton, C. A., Ross, S., Albrink, M., & Rosemurgy, A. S. (2009) Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients. Am. Surg, 75(8), 681–685.

Hirano, Y., Watanabe, T., Uchida, T., Yoshida, S., Tawaraya, K., Kato, H., & Hosokawa, O. (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: single institution experience and literature review. World J Gastroenterol., 16(2), 270–274.

Podolsky, E. R., Curcillo (2nd), P. G. (2010) Single port access (SPA) surgery-a 24-month experience. J Gastrointest Surg., 14(5), 759–767. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1081-6.

Prasad, A. (2010) Single incision laparoscopic surgery. World J. Gastroenterol, 16(21), 2705–2706.

Downloads

How to Cite

1.
Klymenko VN, Syvolap DV, Kravchenko BS. Comparison of the minimally invasive surgical methods of the cholelithiasis treatment: single-port and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Zaporozhye medical journal [Internet]. 2015Sep.16 [cited 2024Apr.19];17(4). Available from: http://zmj.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/50310

Issue

No. 4 (2015): Zaporozhye medical journal

Section

Original research

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.  Лицензия Creative Commons
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)