System analysis of the quality of life self-assessments from the SF-36 questionnaire in breast-feeding or milk formula feeding women
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2016.4.79668Keywords:
System Analysis, Quality Of Life, SF-36 QuestionnaireAbstract
Objective. A system analysis of the self-assessments of quality of life (QOL) and the possible rational correction of psychological dysadaptation of nursing women.
Materials and Methods. A survey among 134 healthy women aged 21 to 40, married and having children aged 1 to 12 months at the time of the survey. The first group consisted of women with breast-fed children (1 to 6 months old and “exclusively breastfed” or 6 to 12 months old and receiving “rational breast feeding”); the second group consisted of women with formula-fed children. The non-specific SF-36 questionnaire has been used for the survey. Statistica 6.0 licensed software has been used for statistical processing of gathered scores.
Results. The breast-feeding women (Group 1) showed higher total results in self-assessment of the quality of life compared to the women forced to feed their children with breast milk substitutes (Group 2). The difference affects all 8 scales of the questionnaire, thus varying from the a priori values of the “null hypothesis” (χ2=5.33, df=1) with statistical error probability of p=0.02. The most significant differences of the SF-36 questionnaire assessment indicator scores between the two groups have been identified on BP (intensity and frequency of pain) and MH (mental health) scales.
Conclusions. Our observations have shown significant differences of self-assessments of QOL by women feeding their children in different ways. Breast feeding leads to positive changes in the system of self-assessment of QOL, the lives of nursing women are characterized by greater social support and role activity; they are more socially adapted, not prone to depression and unreasonable mood swings.
References
Wissinger, D. (2012) Iskusstvo grudnogo vskarmlivaniya [The Art of Breast Feeding]. N. Vilson (Ed.). Moscow: E´KSMO. [in Russian].
Guot-Gumberger, M., & Horman, E. (2008) Grudnoe vskarmlivanie [Breast Feeding]. Olma Media Grup. [in Russian].
Retrieved from https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/SF-36.
Walters, S. J., & Brazier, J. E. (2003) What is the Relationship Between the Minimally Important Difference and Health State Utility Values? The Case of the SF-6-D. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1, 4. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-4.
Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002) The Estimation of a Preference-based Measure of Health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 271–292.
Franks, P., Lubetkin, E., Gold, M. R., Tancredi, D. J., & Jia, H. (2004) Mapping the SF-12 to the EuroQol EQ-5D Index in a National US Sample. Medical Decision Making, 24(3), 247–254. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04265477.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
