Evaluation of the results of surgical treatment of ankle fractures with the tibiofibular syndesmosis injury
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2016.6.85529Keywords:
Ankle Fractures, Tibiofibular Syndesmosis, Orthopedic Procedures, Surgical TraumatologyAbstract
Background. Ankle fractures are the most common injuries among the damages of ankle joint. The most common complication in such fractures is the damage of the tibiofibular joint, leading to increase in the duration of treatment and adverse outcomes. Despite the large number of publications, the problem of this type injury treatment is far from solving it. The questions remain open regarding the method of surgical treatment and results evaluation.
Aim. To evaluate the results of surgical treatment of ankle fractures, complicated with tibiofibular syndesmosis injury with the help of hardware-bazometric complex and make a comparison with the existing methods of assessment, such as AOFAS and OMAS.
Materials and methods. This study presents an analysis of 80 patients with mentioned fractures surgical treatment results. Patients were divided into 2 groups. The first group (44 patients) was treated with the help of tension band wiring for fixing tibiofibular syndesmosis in combination with the original extramedullary plate with polyaxial insertion and blocking of screw for osteosynthesis of lateral malleolus fractures. The second group (36 patients) was treated according to the AO technique. The analysis of results was performed in 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery use of scales AOFAS and OMAS, as well as bazometric and stabilometric assessment using “Bazometr” complex.
Results. In 3 and 6 months AOFAS and OMAS results corresponded to data of bazometric and stabilometric indicators. The analysis showed the best results among the first group of patients, especially in the early stages. In 12 months the difference between indicators reduced, but remained significantly better in the 1st group.
Conclusions. The reported data of clinical observations and their analysis demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method of ankle fractures with the tibiofibular syndesmosis injury surgical treatment.
References
Ahmad, J., Raikin, S. M., Pour, A. E., & Haytmanek, C. (2011) Bioabsorbable screw fixation of the syndesmosis in unstable ankle injuries. Foot Ankle Int., 30(2), 99–105. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2009.0099.
Andrews, L., & Southgate, C. (2011) Re: Outcomes and complications of treatment of ankle diastasis with tightrope fixation. Injury, 41(10), 1096–1097.
Citak, M., Backhaus, M., Muhr, G., & Kalicke, T. (2011) Distal tibial fracture post syndesmotic screw removal: an adverse complication. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 131(10), 1405–8. doi: 10.1007/s00402-011-1314-5.
Johnson, B., Kumar, S., & Sinha, A. (2012). Comparison of outcome following operative fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis with diastasis screw and suture button techniques. Injury Extra, 43(10), 89. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.07.247.
Kozhemyaka, M. A., Golovakha, M. L., Panchenko, S. P., Krasovsky, V. L., & Shevelev, A. V. (2015) Modelirovanie fiksacii bercovykh kostej napryazhennymi petlyami pri povrezhdeniyakh mezhbercovogo sindesmoza [Modeling of fixing tibia with tight loops in injuries of tibiofibular syndesmosis]. Ortopediya, travmatologiya i protezirovanie, 3, 27–35. [in Ukrainian].
Pelc, H., Carmont, M., Sutton, P. , & Blundell, C. (2009). Tightrope stabilisation of proximal and distal tibiofibular syndesmosis rupture: The floating fibula – A case report. Injury Extra, 40(1), 16–18. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.09.016.
Schepers, T., Lieshout, E.M., Vries, M.R., & Van der Els, M. (2011) Complications of syndesmotic screw removal. Foot Ankle Int., 32, 1040–1044.
Soin, S. P., Knight, T. A., Dinah, A. F., Mears, S. C., Swierstra, B. A., & Belkoff, S. M. (2009) Suture-button versus screw fixation in a syndesmosis rupture model: a biomechanical comparison. Foot Ankle Int., 30, 346–352. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2009.0346.
Teramoto, A., Suzuki, D., Kamiya, T., Chikenji, T., Watanabe, K., & Yamashita, T. (2011) Comparison of different fixation methods of the suture-button implant for tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries. Am J Sports Med., 39, 2226–2232.
Holovakha, M. L., Kozhemiaka, M. A., Shyshka, I. V., & Kryvoruchko, Y. A. (patentee) (2014). Patent Ukrainy na korysnu model №95304 «Prystrii dlia osteosyntezu perelomiv dystalnoho viddilu malohomilkovoi kistky z poshkodzhenniam dystalnoho mizhhomilkovoho syndesmozu» 25/12/14 [Ukraine patent for utility model №95304 Device for osteosynthesis of fractures of the distal fibula with damage of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis 25/12/14]. Biuleten, 24 [in Ukrainian].
Holovakha, M. L., & Kozhemiaka, M. A. (patentee) (2015). Patent Ukrainy na korysnu model №103315 «Prystrii dlia khirurhichnoho likuvannia nadsyndesmoznykh perelomiv dystalnoho viddilu malohomilkovoi kistky z poshkodzhenniam mizhhomilkovoho syndesmozu» 12/10/15 [Ukraine patent for utility model №103315 Device for the surgical treatment of suprasyndesmosis fractures of distal fibula with damage of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis 12/10/15]. Biuleten, 23 [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
