Modern aspects of allohernioplasty of postoperative ventral hernias (a literature review)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2021.4.209522Keywords:
postoperative ventral hernia, hernia recurrence, surgical meshAbstract
The aim. Based on the data of the publications of herniologists for the last 5 years to examine the effectiveness and safety of prosthetic materials used in hernioplasty of postoperative ventral hernias.
According to surgeons, the incidence of postoperative ventral hernia is up to 20 % of performed laparotomies, and if risk factors are present – up to 70 %. This problem was considered solved by the use of prosthetic mesh that became the standard of surgical approach in hernia repair since a recurrence rate was reduced to 20 %. However, the results of histological examination and body biological responses to an implant showed chronic inflammatory processes due to use of prosthetic material, especially polypropylene, causing purulent-inflammatory complications and intraperitoneal adhesion in 20.0–45.8 %. To prevent adhesion, a special barrier layer was applied on the polypropylene mesh, a process of mesothelial epithelialization (formation of the neoperitoneum) was supposed to occur, thereby reducing the risk of adhesions. A temporary nature of the barrier coating, where adhesion may develop at any time after implantation resulting in complications, has proven to be a potential problem of composite prostheses. There has been an attempt to address the challenge by using biological meshes made of decellularised pig and bovine dermis. However, recurrence rates after repair of hernia using the biological meshes was 6.3–61.0 %, wound infection – 16.0 %.
Conclusions. Thus, world publications have proved today that it is impossible to perform adequate hernioplasty of postoperative hernias without the use of prosthetic material. However, complications and recurrences of the disease remain quite high. In order to improve these indicators, a sufficient number of studies were conducted, the effect of various prosthetic meshes on the patient body and on the postoperative wound itself was examined. Nevertheless, all the results are often contradictory, without specific conclusions about the indications for the use of method and type of prosthetic material.
References
Volkov, V. (2016). K otsenke pokazatelei v morfologicheskikh mediko-biologicheskikh issledovaniyakh: korrektsiya podkhoda k novomu kompleksnomu statisticheskomu algoritmu [To the assessment of indicators in morphological medicobiological researches: correction of approach to new complex statistical algorithm]. Byulleten' nauki i praktiki, (6), 75-84. [in Russian].
Grubnik, V. V., & Vorotyntseva, K. O. (2018). Primenenie separatsionnykh metodov gernioplastiki pri lechenii posleoperatsionnykh ventral'nykh gryzh [Component separation hernioplasty in treatment of postoperative ventral hernias]. Khirurhiia Ukrainy, (2), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.3978/SU2018286 [in Russian].
Hrubnik, V. V., Parfentyeva, N. D., & Parfentyev, R. S. (2016). Suchasni metody khirurhichnoho likuvannia velykykh ventralnykh hryzh iz vidnovlenniam funktsii m’iaziv perednoi cherevnoi stinky [Modern methods of surgical treatment of large ventral hernia with reconstruction of anterior abdominal wall function]. Shpytalna khirurhiia. Zhurnal imeni L. Ya. Kovalchuka, (2), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2016.2.6402 [in Ukrainian].
Kchibekov, E. A., Kokhanov, A. V., Kaliev, D. R., Kudaev, S. V., Bondarev, V. A., & Serdyukov, M. A. (2018). Osobennosti vospalitel'noi reaktsii krys na implantatsiyu sovremennykh setchatykh endoprotezov dlya gernioplastiki [Features of inflammatory reaction of rats to implantation of modern mesh endoprosthesis for hernioplasty]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, (1). https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.27384 [in Russian].
Muntyan, S. O., Nosov, A. Y., Getman, V. V., Balash, K. P., Chernyak, S. P., & Kruglyak, N. L. (2017). Dynamika pokaznykiv ultrazvukovykh, mikrobiolohichnykh i tsytolohichnykh doslidzhen u likuvanni pisliaoperatsiinykh ranovykh uskladnen z vykorystanniam mahniievmisnykh mineraliv u khvorykh pokhyloho viku [Dynamics of parameters of ultrasonic, microbiological and cytological investigations in the treatment of postoperative wound complications using magnesium containing minerals in the elderly patients]. Medychni perspektyvy, 22(1), 55-60. [in Ukrainian].
Pypa, L. V., & Murhina, M. M. (2017). Suchasni uiavlennia pro patohenez i diahnostyku hniino-septychnykh staniv u ditei (chastyna 1) [Modern understanding of the pathogenesis and diagnosis of septic conditions in children (Part I)]. Infektsiini khvoroby, (2), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.11603/1681-2727.2017.2.7998 [in Ukrainian].
Railyanu, R. I., & Podolinnyi, G. I. (2019). Kontseptsiya naruzhnykh bryushnykh gryzh kak formy soedinitel'notkannoi displazii dlya poiska effektivnykh sposobov khirurgicheskogo lecheniya [The concept of external abdominal hernias as forms of connective tissue dysplasia the search for effective methods of surgical treatment]. Issledovaniya i praktika v meditsine, 6(4), 138-150. https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2019-6-4-14 [in Russian].
Feleshtynskyy, J. P., Lysenko, R. B., & Mishchuk, V. V. (2016). Otsinka efektyvnosti zastosuvannia riznovydiv sitchastykh implantativ pry intraperytonealnii aloplastytsi skladnykh defektiv cherevnoi stinky [Estimate of efficiency of multiple reticular implants application in the severe abdominal wall malformations’ intraperitoneal alloplasty]. Svit medytsyny ta biolohii, 12(1), 166-169. [in Ukrainian].
Helmy, M., & Albalkiny, S. (2018). Anterior component separation versus posterior component separation with transversus abdominus release in abdominal wall reconstruction for incisional hernia. The Egyptian Journal of Surgery, 37(3), 335-343. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_20_18
Atema, J. J., de Vries, F. E., & Boermeester, M. A. (2016). Systematic review and meta-analysis of the repair of potentially contaminated and contaminated abdominal wall defects. The American Journal of Surgery, 212(5), 982-995.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.05.003
Aydin, O., Aydinuraz, K., Agalar, F., Sahiner, I. T., Agalar, C., Bayram, C., Denkbas, E. B., & Atasoy, P. (2017). The effect of thymoquinone coating on adhesive properties of polypropylene mesh. BMC Surgery, 17(1), Article 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0239-5
Azar, F. K., Crawford, T. C., Poruk, K. E., Farrow, N., Cornell, P., Nadra, O., Azoury, S. C., Soares, K. C., Cooney, C. M., & Eckhauser, F. E. (2017). Ventral hernia repair in patients with abdominal loss of domain: an observational study of one institution’s experience. Hernia, 21(2), 245-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1576-0
Biondo-Simões, M., Oda, M. H., Pasqual, S., & Robes, R. R. (2018). Comparative study of polyglactin 910 and simple catgut in the formation of intraperitoneal adhesions. Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira, 33(2), 102-109. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020180020000001
Bittner, J. G., El-Hayek, K., Strong, A. T., LaPinska, M. P., Yoo, J. S., Pauli, E. M., & Kroh, M. (2017). First human use of hybrid synthetic/biologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: a multicenter trial. Surgical Endoscopy, 32(3), 1123-1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5715-6
Cole, W. C., Balent, E. M., Masella, P. C., Kajiura, L. N., Matsumoto, K. W., & Pierce, L. M. (2015). An experimental comparison of the effects of bacterial colonization on biologic and synthetic meshes. Hernia, 19(2), 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1290-0
Costa, T. N., Abdalla, R. Z., Santo, M. A., Tavares, R. R., Abdalla, B. M., & Cecconello, I. (2016). Transabdominal midline reconstruction by minimally invasive surgery: technique and results. Hernia, 20(2), 257-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1457-y
D’Amore, L., Ceci, F., Mattia, S., Fabbi, M., Negro, P., & Gossetti, F. (2016). Adhesion prevention in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study comparing three lightweight porous meshes recommended for intraperitoneal use. Hernia, 21(1), 115-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1541-3
Deerenberg, E. B., Timmermans, L., Hogerzeil, D. P., Slieker, J. C., Eilers, P. H., Jeekel, J., & Lange, J. F. (2014). A systematic review of the surgical treatment of large incisional hernia. Hernia, 19(1), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1321-x
Fischer, J. P., Wink, J. D., Tuggle, C. T., Nelson, J. A., & Kovach, S. J. (2014). Wound risk assessment in ventral hernia repair: generation and internal validation of a risk stratification system using the ACS-NSQIP. Hernia, 19(1), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1318-5
Garcia, D., Santos, C., Neto, Nunes, C. B., Buzelin, M. A., Petroianu, A., Figueiredo, L. O., Motta, A., Gaspar, C. B., & Alberti, L. R. (2017). Comparative study of intraperitoneal adhesions related to light-weight polypropylene mesh and type I polymerized and purified bovine collagen coated light-weight polypropylene mesh in rabbits. Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira, 32(11), 903-912. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020170110000002
Halligan, S., Parker, S. G., Plumb, A. A., & Windsor, A. (2018). Imaging complex ventral hernias, their surgical repair, and their complications. European Radiology, 28(8), 3560-3569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5328-z
Haskins, I. N., Horne, C. M., Krpata, D. M., Prabhu, A. S., Tastaldi, L., Perez, A. J., Rosenblatt, S., Poulose, B. K., & Rosen, M. J. (2018). A call for standardization of wound events reporting following ventral hernia repair. Hernia, 22(5), 729-736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1748-6
Haskins, I. N., Voeller, G. R., Stoikes, N. F., Webb, D. L., Chandler, R. G., Phillips, S., Poulose, B. K., & Rosen, M. J. (2017). Onlay with Adhesive Use Compared with Sublay Mesh Placement in Ventral Hernia Repair: Was Chevrel Right? An Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative Analysis. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 224(5), 962-970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.01.048
Holihan, J. L., Alawadi, Z., Martindale, R. G., Roth, J. S., Wray, C. J., Ko, T. C., Kao, L. S., & Liang, M. K. (2015). Adverse Events after Ventral Hernia Repair: The Vicious Cycle of Complications. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 221(2), 478-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.026
Holihan, J. L., Bondre, I., Askenasy, E. P., Greenberg, J. A., Keith, J. N., Martindale, R. G., Roth, J. S., Liang, M. K., & Ventral Hernia Outcomes Collaborative (VHOC) Writing Group. (2016). Sublay versus underlay in open ventral hernia repair. Journal of Surgical Research, 202(1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.12.014
Holihan, J. L., Nguyen, D. H., Nguyen, M. T., Mo, J., Kao, L. S., & Liang, M. K. (2016). Mesh Location in Open Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. World Journal of Surgery, 40(1), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3252-9
Ibrahim, A. M., Vargas, C. R., Colakoglu, S., Nguyen, J. T., Lin, S. J., & Lee, B. T. (2014). Properties of Meshes used in Hernia Repair: A Comprehensive Review of Synthetic and Biologic Meshes. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, 31(2), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1376886
Kaoutzanis, C., Leichtle, S. W., Mouawad, N. J., Welch, K. B., Lampman, R. M., Wahl, W. L., & Cleary, R. K. (2013). Risk factors for postoperative wound infections and prolonged hospitalization after ventral/incisional hernia repair. Hernia, 19(1), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1155-y
Karatassas, A., Anthony, A., Reid, J., Leopardi, L., Hewett, P., Ibrahim, N., & Maddern, G. (2018). Developing a mesh-tissue integration index and mesh registry database: the next step in the evolution of hernia repair. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 88(6), 528-529. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.14060
Kawaguchi, M., Ueno, H., Takahashi, Y., Watanabe, T., Kato, H., & Hosokawa, O. (2015). Transitional mesh repair for large incisional hernia in the elderly. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, 7, 70-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.12.023
Kumar, S., Edmunds, R. W., Dowdy, C., Chang, Y. W., King, R., & Roth, J. S. (2018). Anterior versus Posterior Component Separation: Which Is Better? Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 142(3S), 47S-53S. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000004852
Lak, K. L., & Goldblatt, M. I. (2018). Mesh Selection in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 142(3S), 99S-106S. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004862
Li, B. G., Gong, D. H., Miao, J. C., Nie, X. Y., & Qin, C. F. (2018). [Totally endoscopic sublay repair (TES) - a novel approach to repair midline ventral hernia]. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi, 98(36), 2933-2936. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.36.012 [in Chinese].
Li, B., Qin, C., & Bittner, R. (2020). Totally endoscopic sublay (TES) repair for midline ventral hernia: surgical technique and preliminary results. Surgical Endoscopy, 34(4), 1543-1550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6568-3
MacFie, J. (2018). Do intra-abdominal adhesions cause pain? British Journal of Surgery, 105(1), 9-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10731
Madani, A., Niculiseanu, P., Marini, W., Kaneva, P. A., Mappin-Kasirer, B., Vassiliou, M. C., Khwaja, K., Fata, P., Fried, G. M., & Feldman, L. S. (2016). Biologic mesh for repair of ventral hernias in contaminated fields: long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Surgical Endoscopy, 31(2), 861-871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5044-1
Mathes, T., Walgenbach, M., & Siegel, R. (2016). Suture Versus Mesh Repair in Primary and Incisional Ventral Hernias: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Journal of Surgery, 40(4), 826-835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3311-2
Matthews, B. D., & Paton, L. (2018). Updates in Mesh and Biomaterials. Surgical Clinics of North America, 98(3), 463-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2018.02.007
Mercoli, H., Tzedakis, S., D’Urso, A., Nedelcu, M., Memeo, R., Meyer, N., Vix, M., Perretta, S., & Mutter, D. (2016). Postoperative complications as an independent risk factor for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study of 417 patients with long-term follow-up. Surgical Endoscopy, 31(3), 1469-1477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5140-2
Parker, S. G., Halligan, S., Liang, M. K., Muysoms, F. E., Adrales, G. L., Boutall, A., de Beaux, A. C., Dietz, U. A., Divino, C. M., Hawn, M. T., Heniford, T. B., Hong, J. P., Ibrahim, N., Itani, K., Jorgensen, L. N., Montgomery, A., Morales-Conde, S., Renard, Y., Sanders, D. L., Smart, N. J., … Windsor, A. (2019). International classification of abdominal wall planes (ICAP) to describe mesh insertion for ventral hernia repair. British Journal of Surgery, 107(3), 209-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11400
Passot, G., Villeneuve, L., Sabbagh, C., Renard, Y., Regimbeau, J.-M., Verhaeghe, P., Kianmanesh, R., Palot, J.-P., Vaudoyer, D., Glehen, O., & Cotte, E. (2016). Definition of giant ventral hernias: Development of standardization through a practice survey. International Journal of Surgery, 28, 136-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.097
Pernar, L., Pernar, C. H., Dieffenbach, B. V., Brooks, D. C., Smink, D. S., & Tavakkoli, A. (2017). What is the BMI threshold for open ventral hernia repair? Surgical Endoscopy, 31(3), 1311-1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5113-5
Rastegarpour, A., Cheung, M., Vardhan, M., Ibrahim, M. M., Butler, C. E., & Levinson, H. (2016). Surgical mesh for ventral incisional hernia repairs: Understanding mesh design. Plastic Surgery, 24(1), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000955
Ribeiro, W. G., Rodrigues, D., Atta, F., Ramos, I., Frazão, F., Torres, O., & Pitombo, M. B. (2019). Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen. Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira, 34(6), Article e201900603. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020190060000003
Ben Salha, M., & Repina, N. B. (2016). Klinicheskaya diagnostika nedifferentsirovannoi displazii soedinitel'noi tkani [Clinical diagnostics of undifferentiated connective tissue dysplasia]. Rossiiskii mediko-biologicheskii vestnik im. akademika I. P. Pavlova, 24(4), 164-172. https://doi.org/10.23888/PAVLOVJ20164164-172 [in Russian].
Serigiolle, L. C., Barbieri, R. L., Gomes, H. M., Rodrigues, D. A., Studart, S., & Leme, P. L. (2015). Critical analysis of experimental model for study of adhesions after incisional hernias induced in rats' and repair of abdominal wall with different biomaterials. ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva, 28(3), 178-182. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-67202015000300008
Silecchia, G., Campanile, F. C., Sanchez, L., Ceccarelli, G., Antinori, A., Ansaloni, L., Olmi, S., Ferrari, G. C., Cuccurullo, D., Baccari, P., Agresta, F., Vettoretto, N., & Piccoli, M. (2015). Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: updated guidelines from the EAES and EHS endorsed Consensus Development Conference. Surgical Endoscopy, 29(9), 2463-2484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4293-8
Suwa, K., Okamoto, T., & Yanaga, K. (2018). Is fascial defect closure with intraperitoneal onlay mesh superior to standard intraperitoneal onlay mesh for laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernia? Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery, 11(4), 378-384. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12471
Todros, S., Pavan, P. G., & Natali, A. N. (2015). Synthetic surgical meshes used in abdominal wall surgery: Part I-materials and structural conformation. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B, Applied Biomaterials, 105(3), 689-699. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33586
Utiyama, E. M., Rosa, M. B., Andres, M., Miranda, J. S., Damous, S. H., Birolini, C. A., Damous, L. L., & Montero, E. F. (2015). Polypropylene and polypropylene/polyglecaprone (Ultrapro(r)) meshes in the repair of incisional hernia in rats. Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira, 30(6), 376-381. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020150060000001
Vorovskyі, О. О., Shaprynskyі, V. O., & Sadyk, I. M. (2019). Morphological changes of a great omentum at implantation ofpolypropylene and composite prostheses at allohernioplasty. Reports of Morphology, 25(4), 62-69. https://doi.org/10.31393/morphology-journal-2019-25(4)-10
Wales, E., & Holloway, S. (2018). The use of prosthetic mesh for abdominal wall repairs: A semi-systematic-literature review. International Wound Journal, 16(1), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12977
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
